We had a spate of responses on Twitter when we started the call for #citizencurators – asking why we were using the terms. What did the project have to do with citizenship and was it an appropriate use of the term curator?
All good questions. Firstly, why ‘citizen’?
The project is essentially asking how Londoners live through a major event. We thought of using the term Londoners, or specifying that we were looking for the involvement of residents, people who worked in London and people who had connections to London. But the term citizen made most sense. We want to connect with people who have a clear sense of being part of, and belonging to, London. And this is not just locational, it is also political. The Olympic Games is much more than a global sporting event, obviously. Packaged as London2012 it is presented as a manifestation of civic identity. Through funding, governance and marketing it is less held at less than an arms length from the national and city governments. There is no doubt that all Londoners are experiencing the event of the Olympics, and all its ramifications and its impact on their life within London through direct or indirect channels. And they are experiencing this as citizens of London. Continue reading →